De Facto Partner Visa Granted After Waiver of Cohabitation Requirement Based on Sponsor's Health
Case Summary
A European Union citizen on a bridging visa whose de facto partner visa was refused — partly due to the relationship commencing soon after a marriage breakdown and the 12-month cohabitation requirement not being met — succeeded at the Migration Review Tribunal after compelling evidence of the sponsor's physical and emotional reliance on the applicant.
Background
Our client had been in Australia on a Subclass 820 Partner Visa with his former wife, an Australian citizen. When that relationship broke down, he began a new relationship with a New Zealand citizen one month later. He waited approximately one year before informing the Department of the dissolution of his previous relationship and the existence of the new relationship, then applied for a Subclass 820 de facto Partner Visa. The application was refused on the basis that the Department was not satisfied the couple was in a genuine de facto relationship. The matter was referred to the MRT on appeal and we assisted with the review.
Challenges
- New relationship commenced shortly after a marriage breakdown, raising genuineness concerns
- The couple did not meet the 12-month cohabitation requirement at the time of application
- Concerns about the sponsor's genuine de facto relationship status required detailed substantiation
- Sponsor's physical health limitations and emotional vulnerability required comprehensive medical evidence
Outcome
The Tribunal accepted that compelling reasons existed for the waiver of the 12-month cohabitation requirement and found the applicant and sponsor to be in a genuine de facto relationship. The matter was remitted to the Department for reconsideration.
Need Help With Your Visa Matter?
Every case is unique. Get personalized assessment of your situation from experienced migration professionals who understand complex immigration challenges.
Request Free Assessment