← Back to Case Studies

Subclass 444 Visa Not Cancelled Despite Substantial Criminal Record — Pacific Island Applicant, Alcohol Offences

Visa TypeSubclass 444
CategoryCharacter / Section 501

Case Summary

An applicant from a Pacific Island nation who had accumulated a substantial criminal record in Australia — primarily alcohol-fuelled offences across multiple gaol sentences — faced visa cancellation under section 501. We successfully argued against cancellation, centering our case on the hardship to his Australian citizen children and his genuine rehabilitation.

Background

The applicant had arrived in Australia on a student visa in 1986 and was later granted permanent residency. Over the years he became involved in a substantial number of criminal offences, many driven by alcohol, and he served multiple periods of imprisonment. The Department notified him of a possible visa cancellation under section 501(2) of the Migration Act in respect of his Transitional Permanent Visa on the basis of his substantial criminal record.

Challenges

  • Multiple criminal convictions and gaol sentences — triggered the section 501 substantial criminal record threshold
  • History of alcohol-driven offending needed to be addressed alongside evidence of change
  • Visa cancellation would separate the applicant from his Australian citizen children — a key countervailing factor

How We Helped

We submitted that even accounting for the serious offending history, the visa should not be cancelled given the significant mitigating circumstances. We focused on the applicant's several Australian citizen children and his role as a financially and emotionally supportive father — cancellation would tear apart a family unit and cause hardship to children who had not offended. We submitted evidence of changed behaviour including the applicant's engagement with alcohol addiction treatment. A detailed clinical psychologist report was provided in support.

Schedule a call to discover how our experience and expertise made it possible

Key Success Factors

  • Compelling hardship evidence focused on the impact of cancellation on the applicant's Australian citizen children
  • Evidence of genuine treatment for alcohol addiction and changed behaviour
  • Clinical psychologist report supporting the rehabilitation findings
  • Framing the father's significant parental responsibilities as a countervailing weight against cancellation
Schedule a call to discover how our experience and expertise made it possible

Outcome

The Department accepted our submissions and decided not to cancel the applicant's visa. The compelling combination of family hardship and genuine rehabilitation was sufficient to override the cancellation basis.

Need Help With Your Visa Matter?

Every case is unique. Get personalized assessment of your situation from experienced migration professionals who understand complex immigration challenges.

Request Free Assessment